I am often asked during the course of conducting a workshop, a forum
or in one-on-one instruction, what it is I mean when I refer to a
photograph, or a photographer for that matter, as having gone ‘beyond
the subject.’
It is a question worthy of
discussion as I deem it vital to the success of any photograph. At
an early age, most of us assume that others see the world much the
way we do. Gradually, we begin to under- stand that this is not the
case. We grow to realize, accept and hopefully appreciate our individuality.
Now the evolution of the artistic process begins. As a student of
mine so gracefully expounded;
All is [becoming] so neutral—which is forcing me to make my
own decisions...to intuit what is taking place. What you [Rob] were
looking for is of no concern to me—what I take from the scene
is of importance to only one [person]—to me—the beauty
of the picture. My mind will make the picture—
Trusting in his own skill and intuition,
he will make photographs for no one but himself; he will find his own
way. He is now on hallowed ground. Our reaction to the understanding
that our awareness comes from a distinctly personal place may manifest
itself in many ways. Some of us feel profoundly alone. Some make a mission
of convincing others that our outlook is the ‘right’ one.
Some come to cherish our unique perspectives, perhaps seeking to share
them in our communications, in our teachings and in our art. Ideally,
we may come to explore our own depths of vision and value others for
theirs. Let’s say, like my student, an individual seeks out experience
to add richness to his growing vision—his vision of himself in
the context of the world. At last, he is accepting of himself and others
and reaches beyond, looking for the underlying truths. He becomes free
of assumption and open to experience. Perhaps he has known for a long
time that he is seeking something beyond himself and so, he has acquired
certain skills, in this case, the skills of the photographer. Now he
picks up the camera he has carried here and there on so many occasions.
He finds a subject he has seen before, a subject that has been presented
and represented so often that it could easily be considered cliché.
But on that day, at that instant, that most common of subjects presents
itself as an unspoiled sacred object of beauty. The subject itself is
seen as a piece of the photographer’s life, and the making of
the picture is so natural as to be guided by instinct alone. Today,
I was drawn to one such object—a red rose.
And, I knew that I had never before seen a rose quite that way. Let
me clarify—I did not know this in the deliberate sense of knowing—rather,
I intuited it. But I assure you that no one, in the history or in
the future humankind, shall ever see that rose at that moment through
the light of my eyes. And I photographed that rose.
We can speak of related art forms. When they achieve the sublime
heights of their form it becomes difficult to express the experience
in terms other than spiritual.
From The Art of Haiku :
The art of haiku is to frame reality in a single
instance that will lock the poet and the reader into sharing the same
experience. It is this thunderbolt- like encounter that has made haiku
the poetry of Zen—it is the voicing of those moments that cannot
be described in prose or logic. This poetic form has breathing beauty
and a moving elusive quality—reading it increases our sense
of tranquility and joy... The play between gods and spirits, thus,
occurred in one breath, in one instant, and it is the same time frame
that haiku has perfected to the ultimate art—the haiku moment...The
object has seized us, we are being held...To render such a moment
is the intent of all haiku, and the discipline of the form.
Indeed, this, I believe, is the intent
of all forms of art. I cannot imagine a better illustration, encompassing
not only, ‘the single instance’ during which a photograph
is taken, ‘the single instance’ during which the photograph
might be viewed, but also the essential ‘framing of reality,’
that is inherent both in the minimalist poetry of Haiku and in the task
of the photographer. At its most powerful, both the photograph and the
Haiku encompass the essential beauty of reality filtered through the
singularity of human perception to realize something greater than both.
Like Haiku, the art of the photograph is the personal rendering of an
experience, not merely a comment upon it. This is the photograph that
goes ‘beyond the subject.’
Now, the person looking at the rose, my rose, experiences
it, so long as he or she is capable of looking, really looking—not
merely of recognizing that this is indeed a photograph of a flower
we commonly call a rose. Provided the viewer does not shuttle the
image through the chemistry of his brain into the broad based category
of ‘roses seen in lifetime,’ he might realize on some
level that he has never quite experienced a rose like this one before.
In the moment he is absorbed in the distinctiveness of that rose,
he learns something of the other, of humankind as a whole, of the
force that might have created both human- kind and the rose. He knows
something of the artist’s vision—something of the enchantment
of that particular rose at that discriminating moment. And he becomes
aware that he is at this moment, everything he has ever been and that
he holds within him the potential for everything he will become. The
artist and the beholder are locked in a moment, sharing if not the
same experience, one that breaks through individual variance to something
profoundly shared. We have the rose; the photograph that embraces
the rose— and in perpetuating the paradisiacal experience of
that rose—the photograph that goes beyond.